Image labeling is not only drawing more boxes. It is leaving a standard that can still be trained, reviewed, and reproduced later. This guide turns Occlusion and Truncation Labeling: Document Edge-Case Rules into an Easy Labeling and YOLO dataset QA workflow.
Occluded and truncated objects are handled differently by project, so include rules and box extent must be documented before labeling.
Launch the tool: Easy Labeling

What This Work Reduces
If ambiguous objects are decided case by case, reviewers cannot separate wrong labels from different label standards.
This topic is less about drawing more boxes and more about preserving occlusion percent and visible box consistently. In object detection, small coordinate errors, class-order changes, and folder mistakes can look like model failures. That is why tool usage and the dataset contract should be documented together.
Quality Signals To Check First
- occlusion percent: record this during Occlusion and Truncation Labeling: Document Edge-Case Rules so label drift can be checked later.
- visible box: record this during Occlusion and Truncation Labeling: Document Edge-Case Rules so label drift can be checked later.
- estimated box: record this during Occlusion and Truncation Labeling: Document Edge-Case Rules so label drift can be checked later.
- edge example: record this during Occlusion and Truncation Labeling: Document Edge-Case Rules so label drift can be checked later.

Easy Labeling Workflow
Start with a small pilot batch. First, define how much occlusion still counts as labelable. Then, decide whether to draw only the visible part or the estimated full object. Opening 20 to 50 sample images in Easy Labeling quickly exposes missing rules in the instruction document. Questions from this step should update the class dictionary or edge-case gallery rather than disappear in chat.
Easy Labeling fits a browser-based local workflow for opening image folders and saving YOLO bounding boxes. It is especially useful for files that should not be uploaded casually, small review batches, and early datasets where class rules are still being tested. The tool does not replace project standards, so the instruction document before labeling and the QA routine after labeling still matter.

Review Example
Reviewers do not need to relabel every image. Open samples and check whether occlusion percent follows the rule, then confirm that estimated box matches the project standard. If the issue repeats, inspect the instruction document, example images, and save settings before blaming an individual labeler.
Practical Checklist
- Before labeling, confirm the occlusion percent rule in the instruction document.
- After saving, spot-check that visible box appears correctly in label files.
- Turn questions from labeling into instruction updates before the next batch.
- Before handoff, package images, labels, class files, and QA notes as one version.
FAQ
Does Occlusion and Truncation Labeling: Document Edge-Case Rules become easy just by using Easy Labeling?
No. Easy Labeling can make local images and YOLO boxes faster to handle, but the project must define the occlusion percent rule. The tool and instruction document need to work together.
Do small datasets need this much QA?
Yes. In a small dataset, one or two mistakes can move results visibly. At minimum, spot-check visible box and class order before handing data to training.
When should labels be redone?
Relabel when the same error type repeats across images or model analysis shows a class keeps drifting. Fix the instruction document first, then review the batch under the updated rule.
Leave a comment